Maven vs Gradle

Picking the right build tool

Java developers face a choice: Maven or Gradle? Both tools handle your project dependencies and automate builds, but they work in different ways. Here's what you need to know to pick the right one for your next project.

Introduction to Maven

Maven is a build automation tool that simplifies project management and builds for Java applications. At its core, Maven automates the software build process - from compilation and testing to packaging and deployment.

Overview

What is Maven

Maven was developed by the Apache Software Foundation and first released in 2004. It emerged as a solution to the challenges faced with Apache Ant, offering a standardized approach to Java project builds with dependency management capabilities.

XML Configuration

Maven uses XML-based project object model files (pom.xml) for project configuration. 

<project>
    <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
    <groupId>com.example</groupId>
    <artifactId>my-app</artifactId>
    <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
    
    <dependencies>
        <dependency>
            <groupId>junit</groupId>
            <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
            <version>4.13.2</version>
            <scope>test</scope>
        </dependency>
    </dependencies>
</project>

Convention over Configuration

Maven follows a predefined directory structure and build lifecycle, reducing the need for explicit configuration.

File with check mark

Centralized Dependency Management

Maven Central Repository hosts thousands of libraries that can be easily integrated into projects.

Connect dots with check marks

What are the trade offs?

Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of choosing Maven.

Advantages

From organizing code to handling dependencies, these advantages show why Maven remains a top choice for Java builds.

  1. Standardized Project Structure: Maven's convention-based approach ensures consistent project organization.
  2. Extensive Plugin Ecosystem: A wide range of plugins extend Maven's functionality for various tasks.
  3. Mature and Stable: With years of development and a large user base, Maven is well-established and reliable.
  4. Transitive Dependency Resolution: Automatically manages dependencies of dependencies.

Disadvantages

While Maven offers many benefits, users should consider several drawbacks before implementing it in their projects.

  1. Verbose XML Configuration: XML can be cumbersome and less readable for complex builds.
  2. Limited Flexibility: Customizing Maven's build lifecycle can be challenging.
  3. All-or-Nothing Approach: Adopting only parts of Maven is difficult; it's designed to be used as a complete solution.
  4. Performance: Full builds can be time-consuming, especially for large projects.

Introduction to Gradle

Gradle is a build automation tool that helps developers streamline their software projects. It brings together scripting capabilities, dependency management, and build processes into one unified system.

Overview

What is Gradle

Gradle was introduced in 2007 as a modern alternative to existing build tools like Maven and Ant. It was designed to address the limitations of both tools while combining their strengths.

Groovy-Based DSL

Gradle uses a Groovy-based Domain Specific Language for build scripts, making them more concise and expressive. 

plugins {
    id 'java'
}

group = 'com.example'
version = '1.0-SNAPSHOT'

repositories {
    mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
    testImplementation 'junit:junit:4.13.2'
}

Kotlin DSL Support

More recent versions offer Kotlin DSL (build.gradle.kts) for enhanced type safety and IDE support. 

plugins {
  alias(libs.plugins.kotlin.jvm)
  application
}

repositories {
  mavenCentral()
}

dependencies {
  testImplementation("org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test-junit5")

  testImplementation(libs.junit.jupiter.engine)

  testRuntimeOnly("org.junit.platform:junit-platform-launcher")

  implementation(libs.guava)
}

application {
  mainClass = "demo.AppKt"
}

tasks.named<Test>("test") {
  useJUnitPlatform()
}

Flexible Build Model

Gradle treats builds as directed acyclic graphs of tasks, offering greater flexibility.

Build model

What are the trade offs?

Let’s take a look at the advantages and disadvantages of choosing Gradle.

Advantages

Gradle stands out with five key features that make it a top choice for build automation.

  1. Concise and Expressive Build Scripts: Gradle's DSL makes build scripts more readable and maintainable.
  2. Incremental Builds: Gradle only executes tasks whose inputs or outputs have changed, significantly improving build times.
  3. Build Cache: Reuses outputs from previous builds, further enhancing performance.
  4. Multi-Project Builds: Superior support for complex, multi-module projects.
  5. Extensibility: Easily extensible with custom tasks and plugins.

Disadvantages

Despite its strengths, Gradle comes with several limitations that teams need to consider before adoption.

  1. Learning Curve: The Groovy-based DSL can be challenging for developers unfamiliar with Groovy.
  2. Documentation Challenges: While comprehensive, Gradle's documentation can sometimes be overwhelming or unclear.
  3. Ecosystem Maturity: Though growing rapidly, Gradle's ecosystem is not as mature as Maven's.
  4. Stability Concerns: Major version upgrades can sometimes introduce breaking changes.

How do Maven and Gradle compare?

Let's compare Maven and Gradle across their configuration approaches, build processes, speed, dependency handling, customization options, and community support.

Configuration Language

Build tools need configuration files to understand project structure, dependencies, and build steps. The choice of configuration language affects how developers write and maintain these instructions.

Maven

Maven uses XML through pom.xml files. XML provides a standardized format that most developers know, but large projects can end up with lengthy configuration files that are hard to navigate.

Gradle

Gradle picked Groovy or Kotlin DSL for its configuration. These languages let developers write more compact build scripts with programming features built in, which helps manage complex build requirements.

Build Lifecycle and Flexibility

The way each tool structures and executes build processes can make a big difference in your team's productivity and your project's scalability.

Maven

Maven follows a rigid, predefined lifecycle with phases like validate, compile, test, package, verify, install, and deploy. While this standardization ensures consistency, it can limit flexibility.

Gradle

Gradle organizes builds as tasks that can be customized and combined in various ways. This task-based approach provides greater flexibility for complex build requirements.

Performance

Build speed directly impacts developer productivity and deployment times - a key factor in choosing between these tools.

Maven

Maven generally requires more full builds, which can be significantly slower, especially for large projects.

Gradle

Gradle excels in performance with:

  • Incremental builds that only process changed files
  • Build cache that reuses outputs from previous builds
  • Parallel execution of tasks
  • Daemon process that keeps build information in memory between builds

Extensibility and Customization

Build tools need to adapt to unique project requirements, making the ability to extend and customize them a key factor in your choice.

Maven

Maven requires developing plugins in Java, following specific conventions, which can be more cumbersome.

Gradle

Gradle makes it easier to create custom tasks and plugins directly in build scripts or as separate projects.

Community and Documentation

A strong support system and clear guidance materials make a big difference in how quickly teams can solve problems and use build tools effectively.

Maven

Maven has an established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and examples developed over many years.

Gradle

Gradle has a growing community and comprehensive documentation, though users sometimes report that the documentation can be difficult to navigate.

Which tool should you pick?

Picking between Maven and Gradle isn't a one-size-fits-all decision. Each build tool serves different project needs and team dynamics. Your choice depends on factors like project complexity, team expertise, and organizational requirements.

Maven is particularly well-suited for:

  1. Projects requiring standardized structures and established conventions
  2. Teams new to build automation tools
  3. Projects where build customization needs are minimal
  4. Enterprises with established Maven infrastructures
  5. Open-source projects that benefit from Maven's widespread adoption

Gradle is particularly well-suited for:

  1. Projects needing flexible configurations and faster build times
  2. Complex, multi-module projects
  3. Projects requiring extensive build customization
  4. Teams comfortable with Groovy or Kotlin
  5. Android development (Google's official build tool for Android)
  6. Projects that need to migrate incrementally from other build tools

Are you looking for a better CI experience?

Buildkite powers software delivery for leading software companies

Start turning complexity into an advantage

Create an account to get started with a 30-day free trial. No credit card required.

Get started View pricing
Buildkite Pipelines

Platform

  1. Pipelines
  2. Pipeline templates
  3. Public pipelines
  4. Test Engine
  5. Package Registries
  6. Mobile Delivery Cloud
  7. Pricing

Hosting options

  1. Self-hosted agents
  2. Mac hosted agents
  3. Linux hosted agents

Resources

  1. Docs
  2. Blog
  3. Changelog
  4. Webinars
  5. Plugins
  6. Case studies
  7. Events
  8. Comparisons

Company

  1. About
  2. Careers
  3. Press
  4. Brand assets
  5. Contact

Solutions

  1. Replace Jenkins
  2. Workflows for AI/ML
  3. Testing at scale
  4. Monorepo mojo
  5. Bazel orchestration

Support

  1. System status
  2. Forum
© Buildkite Pty Ltd 2025
Privacy policy Terms of service